A recent incident at a popular bar is sending ripples through the spirits community, raising questions about communication and pricing transparency. Casie @casierosev’s viral video reveals a shocking $400 cocktail bill resulting from a simple request: ‘no tequila preference.’
The story centers around a woman and her friend who ordered cocktails and, without specifying a particular spirit, stated their preference was against tequila. The bartender, seemingly misunderstanding, opted for Clase Azul tequila, a premium brand known for its Reposado expression, which can command prices exceeding $400. For context, a standard 750ml bottle of Reposado Clase Azul typically retails for just over $150.
What started as a seemingly minor oversight quickly escalated into a heated discussion. The women, understandably stunned by the expense, questioned the bartender’s decision, pointing out that ‘no preference’ should typically translate to a more accessible spirit like vodka or gin. The viral video’s top comment perfectly encapsulates the frustration: ‘This is so weird because I thought it was standard to serve well/house when someone doesn’t have a preference.’
The incident has ignited a debate about customer service and clarity in the bar industry. Industry analysts highlight a crucial disconnect: when customers express a lack of preference, bartenders must proactively clarify their intent. Recommendations abound, including listing spirit prices on menus and openly discussing options before crafting a cocktail. Daily Meal cautions against ordering high-end liquors in sugary drinks, while VinePair stresses the importance of transparent pricing.
The case underscores the need for meticulous communication between bartenders and patrons. While a simple ‘no preference’ carries significant weight, it demands a corresponding clarification from the server. This costly misunderstanding serves as a potent reminder: a little dialogue can save a lot of money – and a lot of eyebrows – in the world of cocktails.
