Overview: Scanning liquor store shelves reveals a spectrum ranging from established brands to unusually packaged varieties. Bourbon experts warn that over-the-top packaging often serves as a distraction, suggesting consumers should prioritize traditional shapes when selecting spirits.
The Full Story
Blake Johns, founder of Smokeye Hill, advises avoiding absurdly shaped glass bottles such as machine guns or swords. He notes that novelty containers often imply the consumer is paying for the glass rather than the whiskey quality inside it. Heather Butcher, Director of Food and Beverage at Conrad Indianapolis, supports this sentiment by advising against heavy wax tops, ornate bottles, and velvet bags.
While Willett Pot Still Reserve features a unique bottle designed to look like a traditional pot still, reviews remain mixed. One assessment noted the product “doesn’t quite live up to its show-stopping decanter,” while another observation suggested people drink it primarily because they think the bottle is cool. Conversely, popular top-sellers such as Jim Beam, Evan Williams, and Maker’s Mark bear familiar, traditional shapes. Similarly, winners of the 2026 World Whiskies Awards best bourbon categories utilize typical bottle shapes.
What This Means
Overly flashy bottles are far from the only red flag noted by experts, but they remain an easy sign to spot for separating true contenders from potential pretenders. Factors like the bottle’s age, proof, and mash bill reveal a good deal of important information regarding quality. A lack of details or a long marketing story can also signal issues, though packaging is the most accessible warning sign.
Consumer Takeaway
Sophisticated shoppers can consider single barrel versus blended options and whether the item is “bottled in bond.” This legal designation requires production in one distillation season by a single distiller at a single facility, aged four years under government supervision. It must also meet precise bottling guidelines, such as having no added colors or flavors.
Source: Read the original article
